Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Scott (entertainer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Clear consensus that the subject is highly notable. (non-admin closure) Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Tom Scott (entertainer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ENT only a Youtuber MrTumble394879 (talk) 12:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Obvious speedy keep. Clearly and very obviously does meet WP:GNG. Just because a person is on YouTube that does not preclude them being notable. There are 51 references spanning more than a decade of sustained coverage of his notability for a mixture of activities, not all of them even related to YouTube. Not all of the references are great but there are more than enough good ones that this AfD is completely ill conceived and I suggest a speedy close. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: I'm not sure why PROD tags were also put on the article and its talk page. I've removed those as this AfD clearly supersedes those. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep per DanielRigal. Citobun (talk) 13:57, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - I agree with above, there is a substantial amount of proper references that indicate article's subject meets criteria WP:GNG.-- Melaleuca alternifolia  |  talk  17:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep - Same, I agree with DanielRigal. Other YouTubers with as large an audience as Tom have Wiki pages, and WP:GNG does seem to be met in this case. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep He's "only a YouTuber" but he's still a notable one. 100% obvious keep. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.