Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Teichman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  13:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Tom Teichman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sole quality source is the Evening Standard. Nothing else located on a search, same as the talk page message left by the person who tagged this for notability earlier this year. Single source is not enough to retain the article. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep subject seems to meet WP:BASIC. In addition to what's in the article including Evening Standard, there's decent of coverage in FT including this, which has both an interview and secondary coverage . Lots of other short mentions of the subject in FT. If no consensus to keep, redirect to Simba Sleep which makes mention of the subject. &mdash;siro&chi;o 03:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Not even close to WP:N. I have to wonder how this got created in the first place, it must have fallen through cracks.
 * Ldm1954 (talk) 19:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.