Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Werme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  04:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Tom Werme

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:RS. I have seen several poorly sourced articles of late on the AfD forum about non-notable sports broadcasters. Has there been any determination about what to do with them? Ad Orientem (talk) 01:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have been trying to add more sources to the article but I keep having edit conflicts. I am really going through a rough time on Wikipedia. I think I need a break pretty soon. Ashbeckjonathan 02:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * See my reply to your comment on my talk page. This is fixable. Just create a list for sports broadcasters. The notability for that topic should not be hard to establish and then all you need to do to add any of these people to the list is establish that they exist and meet the criteria for inclusion. This relives you of establishing individual notability for each person which I think would be almost impossible. Most of the articles I have seen were no more than a few sentences anyways. That can often fit into a list. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  02:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. I have been working on improving the article including getting more references and expand the article by adding more information about Werme. This may do the trick in order to improve this article. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 03:28, 20 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  04:00, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.