Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom mcnee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete g5 (created by blocked user), a7 (nonnotable), g10 (attack -- based on prior deleted edits). NawlinWiki 02:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Tom mcnee

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems to be a hoax; Google turns up no hits at all for a boxer of this name at all. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Even tho this "first openly homosexual boxer" went 0/0/3, you would think you could find something on Google for him. Hoax or he needs a new publicist.  Pharmboy 23:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't feel insulting someones publicist is helping you may aswell rotate sunshine, buy this months RING MAGAZIne which he features in. and also you should tone down on the homophobia why highlight the fact he is openly homosexual — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbfcnfkcmnsuxh (talk • contribs)
 * Selfrightousness isn't necessary as I am not a homophobe. It is a direct quote from the article, which looks quite fishy.  So does the fact that someone can't be found on a search engine.  Pharmboy 00:08, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. Possibly a hoax. James Luftan 00:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom and James Luftan. Bullzeye Complaint Dept./Contribs) 00:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. User:Cbfcnfkcmnsuxh, who created this article, has been indefinitely blocked for his malicious contributions (i. e. removing the AfD tag three times from the article, even after repeated warnings; insulting me twice on my user talk page; and creating a hoax article). Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, Ten Pound, I tried to warn him for getting snippy with you on your user page as well as trying to explain to him why his article was nominated for deletion several seconds before he was blocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Luftan (talk • contribs)
 * Delete Per above, probably a hoax, made by now blocked user. i  (said)  (did) 00:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- Probably a hoax. -- Boricua  e  ddie  01:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.