Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomas Guinan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE (discounting IPs).  Rob e  rt  T 23:18, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Tomas Guinan (Vote 2)
The following discussion was from the October 14th AfD. I've moved it here since there was a single registered vote, and although that is 100% for delete, 1 vote seems inadequate. Now that I'm handling the admin side of things I will Abstain. Wikibofh 23:48, 21 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete NN bio. 202.156.6.62 22:47, 14 October 2005 (UTC) Note: 202.156.6.62 is a suspected sock puppet.
 * Delete Notability not established. Denni &#9775; 03:58, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep He helped create a an internet cartoon. There's no reason to delete.--65.65.202.3 02:52, 19 October 2005 (UTC) (Note: This user has only two edits so far, and both edits are in AfD.)
 * Merge Most of this article and Alan Guinan should be merged with Eskimo Bob. 24.224.138.240 13:02, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity. No need to create a brand-new afd for this, just move the old one to today's page.  And how did its parent article Eskimo Bob survive when 100% of the comments from users with more than a dozen edits were to delete? &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Eskimo Bob survived, obviously, because of magic. :)  I looked at registered users, and tried to make an informed decision.  I'm open for being corrected.  I thought about trying to just move it to here, the problem with that is I don't know how that would affect the old closure, which I'd hate to see that day stay open just for this.  I'm still reasonably new, so if you have suggestions for a better way to handle it, I'm always open. Wikibofh 00:30, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I went back and took a look at Eskimo Bob's AfD.  There were 4 registered votes, 2 keep, 2 delete.  The 2 delete were obvious experienced users, the 2 keeps were obviously new users, but not obviously meat/sockpuppets.  Both had about 20 edits, and the focus did not seem to be on Bob or it's ilk.  Thus, 2 v 2 is no consensus, and as a result, keep. Wikibofh 15:42, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Isotope23 02:33, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. -R. fiend 21:51, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.