Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomatocart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:39, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Tomatocart

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails Notability of Web content
 * This is a previous CSD A7 deleted twice previously with no noted improvement between recreations. As per this DIFF, it was recreated for a third time with the Refimprove tag already in place; ergo no article improvement. It was nominated for a third CSD A7 Web content Speedy Deletion but was declined because this ecommerce product (as per its article description - the software primarily interfaces with servers; thus making it web content related) "did not meet A7 criteria". Another editor WP:PRODed it but the article is brought to the full community for WP:CONSENSUS. There is no guarantee the PROD tag will be allowed to continue in place for seven days which makes an Article for Debate the more appropriate forum for discussion and consensus. --moreno oso (talk) 12:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Absolutely no references or coverage. Lends to ADVERT. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 13:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Still no notability has been proven. Joe Chill (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, software is not web content. Joe Chill (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.