Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomawanda Seneca Nation Land Claim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge/redirect to Tonawanda Reservation Since this text is unformatted and could be a copyvio for all I know, I have just pasted it to the page in questions talk page, where it can be merged in later. W.marsh 18:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Tomawanda Seneca Nation Land Claim
Contested prod. User:The Famous Movie Director originally submitted this as a speedy saying "may be original research, no context provided". NickelShoe (Talk) 15:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete or Merge. I can't make sense of it since I have no background in the topic, but perhaps it could be merged into one of the articles on Tonawanda Reservation. Changed vote, see below. --Grace 22:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 13:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge into Tonawanda Reservation or a sub-article thereof. (Note that the "m" in the name should actually be an "n".)  I work a county away from the affected area, and this controversy gets a lot of coverage in regional newspapers such as the Ithaca Journal (ithacajournal.com).  State and federal court cases have centered on this topic, and single-issue interest groups have formed and engaged in considerable argument.  Current version of article has no citations and appears to be an original-research summary of the facts.  Topic is notable, but doesn't need to be split off with a long name that won't be a common search term.  Barno 20:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Cleanup and Merge into Tonawanda Reservation or appropriate subpage per Barno. --Grace 21:57, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.