Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomb of Muhammad Iqbal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 14:09Z 

Tomb of Muhammad Iqbal

 * — (View AfD)

Delete - two of the six images are already included in the Muhammad Iqbal article so merging isn't an option (would overwhelm the article) and there just doesn't seem to be a need for a separate article just for the tomb to note that there are many visitors each day. Otto4711 20:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, tourist destinations are notable. And see e.g. Lenin's Mausoleum.--Ioannes Pragensis 21:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. However, both this article and Lenin's Mausoleum don't include references to establish their notability. Sancho McCann 07:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletions.   --  &rArr;  bsnowball  10:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Adds nothing to the material in the article on the individual. Nice tomb, though. Edison 16:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: Article has been updated with some relevant material, which should change the opinions. added stub.-- Isle  Scape  18:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.
 * Keep - per lenin's mausoleum. Baka man  19:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ridiculous nomination. - Darwinek 22:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep a civil tongue in your head, or civil fingers on your keyboard. The article was shit when it was nominated and has now been much improved. Try not coming so late to the party next time. Otto4711 23:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Request you to be civil and not make such rude comments to other editors. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  17:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article gives substantially more information than just noting that there are many visitors each day.  Too much detail for merger --  would be clutter in the bio article. JamesMLane t c 19:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article is on a structure and does not fit in a bio article. Such a structure which happens to be a tourist location is definately notable. Secondly, just because the article was a stub when you viewed it, it does not qualify as grounds to delete. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  17:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - I see no harm in keeping it. The text does not match the article on Dr. Iqbal as well.--  MARWAT   21:35, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.