Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tombola (bingo company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Tombola (bingo company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails general and corporate notability. No considerable independent coverage by trusted publishers. Mainly maintained by one relatively inactive user, additionally suffers from lack of neutrality and overly promotional tone. Rayman60 (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources found:, Not all are perfect but notability's certainly there. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I agree with Davey, there are sources to support some notability and even though it may seem overly promotional AfD is not for clean up work.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 19:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.