Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tombstone's Main Event: A Tragedy at the O.K. Corral


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. Deor (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Tombstone's Main Event: A Tragedy at the O.K. Corral

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None of the working sources cited refer to the title of the article or the play that the article describes. A search for the article title reveals a few results but they appear to be from 2007-2009. A phone call to a number associated with an old listing went unanswered. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 21:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 08:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The primary author of this article, Bill Westman, has not been active on Wikipedia since October 2, 2013. His last edit to this article was to restore the list of cast members to that when he first created the article in 2008. The article was immediately nominated for speedy deletion when User:Lifebaka prevented its early deletion. It has grown since then from 885k to 3976k. No content was added. The change in size can be attributed to sources that do not support the content, external links, categories, and stub templates. At best, the article is seriously flawed and lacking notability. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 23:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.