Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomin J. Thachankary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 20:50, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Tomin J. Thachankary

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO. Article is unsourced and WP:BEFORE turned up nothing that meets direct and indepth WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS / WP:IS. Wikipedia needs to follow sourcing and notability guidelines strictly for BLPs.  // Timothy ::  talk  15:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  15:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  15:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep for now - the article was started yesterday. The AfD appears a little too short-triggered. While there is no evidence of WP:N, the section structure indicates a work in progress, and it is entirely possible that the author(s) will provide enough evidence of notability in coming days. Of course, it is possible that ultimately, in 2 weeks, we see the article still doesn't meet WP:N, but I think AfD's within a day of article creation are a bit too hasty. Again, if there is no evidence of WP:N in 2 weeks, I'd be happy to change my vote to delete. If I don't log in around then, editors should feel free to count my vote as Delete if there is no WP:RS added by that point. — Ad Meliora Talk∕Contribs 19:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify Changing my vote per suggestion from Vexations — Ad Meliora Talk∕Contribs 11:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I'm not sure I quite understand the reason for draftify which isn't an impossible AfD outcome but is relatively rare.
 * Draftify I see no indication that the subject is notable, but the creator ought to be able to make that case before we proceed with deletion. Vexations (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify - Vexations provided a good alternative. Foxnpichu (talk) 11:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.