Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommaso A. Dragani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Copyvios can be resolved by normal processes -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 20:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Tommaso A. Dragani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article or section have been copied and pasted from (https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-016-0654-y), possibly in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please find the CopyVios report. Amkgp (talk) 18:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep The article, as it is now, doesn't violate any copyright. Please, provide precise proofs, in case you do not agree. Vasssi (talk) 18:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC) — Vasssi (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WP:SOCKSTRIKE
 * Keep The article looks like as it has been modified. Indeed, it does not violate any copyright, as it is different from https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-016-0654-y Kat7531 (talk) 12:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC). — Kat7531 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  WP:SOCKSTRIKE
 * Keep I checked and saw that there is no plagiarism with the material reported in BMC Medicine. The article complies with Wikipedia policies. So there is no reason to delete it. Adalberto75 (talk) 22:53, 15 April 2020 (UTC). — Adalberto75 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  WP:SOCKSTRIKE
 * , if "copyvio" is the only metric by which you are nominating this page, then I will have to speedy close as that has been dealt with. If there is another valid reason why this page should be deleted, please update your nomination. Primefac (talk) 15:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * copyyvio aside, this is spam and needs to be blown up. I'd suggest draftifying and requiring AFC. Praxidicae (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Copyvio is the main issue. I was little doubtful because I was concerned whether any percentage of grace in copying is allowable or not as currently its showing 13% similarity because the creator has made changes after the delete notice. Amkgp (talk) 16:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.