Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Demenkoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 06:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Tommy Demenkoff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Blimey, you'd think this guy was a Oscar winner or something but no, nothing here in all that puff that say's notable. This is just UPE Promotion for a Non notable actor. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article is bombarded with multiple sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage of him. Some don't even mention his name. Pure PR complete with official promo shot. And this has even been cleaned up a bit,. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:22, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:22, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:22, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:23, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:23, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Oh puffery, thy name is Demenkoff. His IMDb credits are sparse and do not satisfy WP:NACTOR. Media coverage is non-existent, so no WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTPROMO. With extra demerits to page creator User:Amandadoyle543 for Citation overkill.  I note that User:Amandadoyle543, an active editor, is a repeat offender who has created a series of pages on minor actors and "financial experts" bombarded with trivial sources. 21% of articles he created have been deleted..E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete not sure if he is notable or not but this is so promotional it qualifies for speedy deletion G11 in my view and is a paid advert and an example of WP:PROMO, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.