Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Golden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 12:41, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Tommy Golden

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Heavily promotional article, written by an SPA whom I have to suspect is an associate if not the subject himself, about a paranormalist. There are of course no definite independent sources. Searching for this fellow is hellishly difficult but I didn't turn up anything that encouraged me to more extensive searching. Mangoe (talk) 16:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:BASIC notability criteria for WP:BIO. - LuckyLouie (talk) 16:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of meeting our notability standards in the article - only 'references' are written by Golden himself. I couldn't find anything elsewhere either. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:50, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I see no reason for Wikipedia to publicize this nutcase's delusions. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 06:01, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete There appears to be no basis for his notability. IRWolfie- (talk) 14:29, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The 'ideas' appear to be incoherent and I see no evidence of notability. Paul B (talk) 14:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.