Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Scott (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Tommy Scott (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable BLP, only known mainly for his musical contributions. Not enough to warrant a separate article about the musician himself, though his band may be notable. I propose delete, redirect, or merge. kikichugirl inquire 19:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. kikichugirl inquire 19:33, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -  →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  22:25, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -  →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  22:25, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Talk about hedging your bets - AfD is just for proposing deletion. Scott's best-known band are very obviously notable and he received plenty of coverage in the time he was lead singer of Space. He has continued to receive coverage since, e.g. Daily Post, Louder Than War, Liverpool Echo, Tom Jones: Close Up, Click Liverpool, Chester Chronicle. --Michig (talk) 08:34, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I appreciate I made the page, so disregard my opinion if necessary. Space might not be known outside Britain, but they were quite big in the '90s, have played several festivals this year and are touring in autumn, when they have an album coming out. As the above user says, Scott has been featured in the press several times over the past few years. I am currently working on getting more citations into the article as I know it lacked citations before.HebrewGrrl (talk) 09:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)HebrewGrrl
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:10, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - per a review of sources, meets WP:BASIC. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:13, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.