Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomo Vladimirski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Listed for 21 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Tomo Vladimirski

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of citations. Nipson anomhmata  (Talk) 15:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep needs a refimprove, but the single link under ext links talks about a national gallery putting on an exhibition of his work and confirms the 'founder of Macedonian painting' claim. I've moved that link to an inline cite and added a reflist plus improve tag, with that I think it's enough to keep as a stub.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 19:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 03:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep 100th anniversary retrospective in the National Gallery must make him notable, even though this will probably never be improved. Johnbod (talk) 04:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.