Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomorrow's Memoir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Tomorrow's Memoir

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced article about a short film, not making any notability claim strong enough to pass WP:NFO. The notability claim being attempted here is that it won a minor award at a comics convention, which is not "inherently" notable enough to exempt the film from having to have reliable source coverage about it in real media -- but while this asserts that the film got a review in Film Threat, it doesn't actually reference that, and it otherwise claims "positive reviews" from non-notable sources like "Moviehole" and "several independent online sources" that aren't WP:GNG-worthy. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the film from having to have any real coverage in real media. Bearcat (talk) 04:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 04:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment, there is not a great deal in newspaper coverage from around the period, but I did find an article from 2005 mostly about Jim Cliffe here which does detail this film, but not exclusively. It seems he is notable though and this was his first "professional film", albeit not a feature one. Unsure if the above and the award is sufficient though, so can't go keep on that alone. Bungle (talk • contribs) 12:17, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * One article in his own hometown local newspaper wouldn't even really be enough all by itself to establish his notability as a person. Bearcat (talk) 13:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * In fairness, I wasn't doing a notability search on the person but it just happened to be a hit when searching for the film. I posted it for the purposes of showing that it is the best I could find on a newspapers search from that time, but that I am not convinced enough either to move to "keep". Bungle (talk • contribs) 14:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per nom, doesn't meet WP:NFO. Honestly surprised it lasted this long. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.