Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tompall Glaser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snowball keep plus withdrawal of nom Grutness...wha?  01:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Tompall Glaser

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable sing, original research, no sources reliable nor otherwise since mid to late 2007, no substantive edits, one external link NewAtThis (talk) 00:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

SPEEDY KEEP AND MOTION TO WITHDRAW, per 10 pound hammer's edits.NewAtThis (talk) 01:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - unsourced is not the same as unsourceable. A google news search shows a lot of hits that look to be about him or reviews of his work although behind pay walls.  One of the artists who created Wanted! The Outlaws, country's first million selling album, also confirmed in this USA Today article. -- Whpq (talk) 00:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Notable not just for his work in Tompall and the Glaser Brothers (which I'm surprised is still a red link), but also on his own -- multiple charted singles on the country charts, for one. His All Music Guide bio is a good place to start. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, CMT bio as a secondary source plus the All Music Guide satisfies WP:V and WP:N. MrPrada (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added some information to the article. Now to work on pages for his brothers Jim and Chuck, as well as a page for their band. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep notable musician. JJL (talk) 00:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.