Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toner bomb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Toner bomb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced ‘how to’ article. PROD contested by another editor unclear why this is unsourced and unencyclopaedic. Mccapra (talk) 21:32, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 21:32, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 21:32, 15 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Outside of mirrors of this article, I'm not finding a single source that discusses this term in the manner that its described here. This may have simply been an attempt at a WP:NEO that never obtained widespread use.  The only real hits I'm even coming up with are in regards to a literal explosive that was attempted to be smuggled in a toner cartridge, and even then, there are only a couple of sources that use the term "toner bomb" to describe that item as well.  Rorshacma (talk) 00:03, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. This might be an effect that is genuinely used in the film industry, and the WP:HOWTO nature of the page can be edited out to make a decent article, but without sourcing it is not verifiable and fails general notability. I could be persuaded to change my opinion if reliable sources come to light. SpinningSpark 00:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I could find documentation on this effect being done with CGI, but no documentation on this. Uncle G (talk) 12:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources; appears to be WP:Original research. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.