Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonescape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. FT2 (Talk 21:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Arguments for keeping are based on three main proposals:
 * Uniqueness and novelty, or historical significance for being first to exploit a new method.
 * Too new to have acquired fair representative online references via Google.
 * A notably useful tool for people seeking this function and users in the field have almost certainly heard of it.

Uniqueness, novelty, importance, history, are all claims that could (if notable) be evidenced. If it is notably important to musicians, somewhere there are awards, commendations, reviews, editorials by notable musical magazines, etc which could be linked. If reviews are out of date they will catch up within a short time. That it may be looking to success, is not a comment on its status now, and right now, today, it seems to be new and minor alpha software of a certain novelty, with no verifiable evidence of notability in the music field from any type of sources (reliable or otherwise) being supplied. Claims of notability are not, themselves, notability, and a request for sources by more than one editor did not result in more than statements of editors' own personal views, impressions and opinions ("original research" in Wikipedia terms).

In addition, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball -- a hope or expectation of future success does not mean that today, it is notable. Until then, hopes of future fame, and this article, are premature.

Tonescape

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete: See related Articles for deletion/Joe Monzo. The Joe Monzo vanity article was recently deleted and this is a little-known piece of software created by him.  It gets only 43 Google hits which is unimpressive for software.  Fails WP:CORP, etc. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable software Corpx 19:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The software is notable in that very few programs exist for the express purpose of composing microtonal music. It may be commercial, but it was developed "in the open" with the online community of microtonal composers.  The fact that it has relatively few Google hits is probably due to the fact that it is a relatively new program in its first official release. -- DaveSeidel 22:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 06:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's quite a unique piece of software, with a highly original approach to computer-aided composition. It's also a resource pedagogically when it comes to learning, teaching, or exploring tuning theory. Gene Ward Smith 03:57, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm not seeing much about notability. Where are the independent reliable sources to establish notability?  All I see is a piece of software that few have heard of.  —Wknight94 (talk) 04:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm not sure whether it should be kept, but I've edited some of the more egregious ad-like copy out of the article. And the Google search above currently returns 182 hits.  Probably it's not notable as a piece of software, but it may be notable from a music-theory perspective. CKL
 * Keep It's relevant and important primarily for its unusual and useful nature. There simply isn't other equivalent software.  This isn't just another word processor or solitaire game.  It's exactly the sort of thing I like to find on Wikipedia -- I may not have heard of it any other way. -71.87.34.189 02:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's still in alpha, but is looking to be a *very* promising tool for the composition and analysis of microtonal music; it is, indeed, *very* noteworthy, though a little specialist. If you talk to people actively involved in the microtonal community, there's a very, very high chance that they've heard of this and tried it out . -134.226.81.3 20:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Can the article be expanded using reviews, or articles about positive or negative features at this time other than from its authors, the Tonalsoft website or different yahoo groups? - Mireut 15:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Tonescape is not only notable for its own intrinsic merits -- it's also historically important as a piece of computer software. It is the first serious music composition software which exploits the use of pitch space, a concept which music theorists have been discussing for centuries, at least since Euler. Tonescape's Lattice window does not just give a simple, static depiction of a tuning's harmonic properties, as do other programs such as JICalc for the Mac and the multi-platform Scala -- Tonescape's Lattice is a 3-dimensional rotatable view that depicts tunings which have up to 7 dimensions in their harmonic makeup, and as a user explores chords on the Lattice, he can then drag them over to the score and simply pop them into a piece. The geometry of a temperament can also be shown in "closed" form, which twist the Lattice into a helix or torus ... i'm sure there is no other music software which can do this, only such applications as Mathematica etc. -Starky32 01:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.