Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonetta Chester


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. extransit (talk) 21:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Tonetta Chester

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is about an author who has published one book ("Her second book, Sunshine through Darkness, will be released in summer 2010"). The subject of the article does not appear to meet inclusion criteria outlined at WP:AUTHOR. Also, there are no references independent of the subject. Peacock (talk) 20:35, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - she's done well for herself but how is she notable? Eddie.willers (talk) 15:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage about her or her one book in reliable sources. Note that Google Books indicates it was published through Wheatmark self-publishing company. -- Whpq (talk) 16:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for Rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron.   Snotty Wong   spill the beans 20:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note The article under discussion here was tagged for Rescue by anonymous SPA 64.255.164.103.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 05:44, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable sources. Original author of the article is a WP:SPA, indicating a possible conflict of interest.    Snotty Wong   spill the beans 20:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - not notable, no sources to speak of.  GregJackP    Boomer!  12:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.