Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonica Marlow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Tonica Marlow

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:BIO WP:NOTE Not clearly notable. Most references are to church newsletters. Author of book, but the book has no Wikipedia article and is not particularly notable John Nagle (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Book is not in top 1 million on Amazon. "Tonica Marlow" has 4 hits in Google News archives. Zero hits in Google Scholar. No notability other than book. --John Nagle (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Keep. --Apollo789 (talk) 20:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment "Tova Mordechai" search yields 8 gbook and 36 gnews  hits. Does it make her notable? Not sure. I've seen less notable articles kept, and more notable deleted. Also it is worth saying that this article is mentioned at the current Arbitration proceedings . Some participants might want it temporarily be kept as an evidence.  M0RD00R (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added several references from reliable sources, including one reference from the Jerusalem Post. I think notability is firmly established. If the article is kept, it should be moved to Tova Mordechai, the name by which she is best known. I do not think that the article unduly promotes a particular point of view, but any inappropriate external links can be removed if there is a consensus to do so. - Eastmain (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Worldcat lists 50 holdings for To play with fire (©2002), 13 holdings for Playing with fire (1991), and 6 for Goodnight my friend Aleph. - Eastmain (talk) 21:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The book is probably more notable than the author. I could see having an article about the book.  --John Nagle (talk) 06:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * John, feel free to repurpose the article and move to a new title along those lines, that is probably a good idea. Guy (Help!) 21:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)\
 * But if we would assume that her book is notable then per WP:AUTHOR wouldn't author herself be notable as well? M0RD00R (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This person has accomplished nothing to make her worthy of an article in any encyclopedia, on-line or not. Rasputin72 (talk) 06:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Books did not generate reviews, cited news articles are local coverage of speaking engagements rather than significant coverage of the individual. Racepacket (talk) 09:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per above.  smithers  - talk  21:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.