Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tono Rosario


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash talk 02:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Tono Rosario

 * Significance not asserted in article. Nom, exclusionist votes for STRONG DELETE --Chazz88 15:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

*Delete is it a vanity article or what? Still, it might as well be the POTUS for all the use that article is. Dan 18:26, 2 January 2006 (UTC) Comment I did read the article before nominating, thank you very much, and am slightly put off by your acerbic attitude. When I, and no doubt those before me, read the article it consisted of nothing more than a date. You might be better served yourself by reading the page history. Dan 22:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * delete way substub, not even enought to say whether it's even supposed to be an NN bio Pete.Hurd 17:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep and cleanup. Article concerns international merengue star with numerous albums at amazon . Please read articles before nominating. -- JJay 20:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh bugger, I've done it again haven't I? Somebody reduced the page to a single date, and then you restored it. Sorry. Still though, you do have to take into account that the version all of us saw was entirely different. Now, where's that strikethrough?Dan 22:07, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't mean to be acerbic. But given the frequency of page blanking, noms should check page history before AfD. -- JJay 22:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but cleanup in light of new information. Article subject is significant, and information useful. The grammar etc. is just a little messy that's all. Dan 22:22, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.