Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tons of Rentals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete after I tagged it (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  17:03, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Tons of Rentals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A property management company without tons (or even ounces) of references. Fails WP:NOTADVERTISING. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Article doesn't even make any claim of notability. No independent RS.  Fails WP:CORP. MB 01:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I've removed most of the promotional tone but subject does not meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 03:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nothing provided or found suggests that this is more than a firm going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero coverage to be found aside from internet yellow pages and a few reviews from customers. Mr. Magoo (talk) 18:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.