Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TonyBet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Toohool's rationale is convincing here. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

TonyBet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not responding WP:NCORP as there are mainly press releases, gambling spammy websites references and own official non-reliable or other suspicious sources Mambo Rumbo (talk) 07:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Companies,  and Websites. Skynxnex (talk) 14:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * looks pretty good as a source. 2 or 3 more like that would be plenty IMO. The other sources in the article seem pretty weak, but I don't know the field well enough to be sure. Hobit (talk) 17:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Hobit no, they look terrible and paid. Here are some clues -- Notability (organizations and companies) 24.138.27.215 (talk) 10:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Hobit the site itself doesn't look notable or reliable. I mean baltictimes. it's a ghost site with 100k visits. https://pokerindustrypro.com/ this one it terrible with 19k visits. and it's run by some freelancers from India which are spamming with paid articles in news all around. 24.138.27.215 (talk) 14:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Could you be more specific? Are you saying  is a paid-for article?  It most certainly doesn't feel like it.  Also  is unlikely to be a paid article, though it seems to be mostly behind a paywall. Hobit (talk) 13:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC
 * Delete no significant coverage and reliable ind. sources. 24.138.27.215 (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I've provided two here, could you explain why the coverage isn't helpful toward WP:N? Hobit (talk) 16:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet, and the IP above appears to be another of his socks. Part of a rapid-fire mass nomination of gambling companies with zero WP:BEFORE diligence. Toohool (talk) 22:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.