Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Beet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Tony Beet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NMUSIC. Tagged for notability since July 2020. Insufficiently referenced, and tagged for verification since Feb 2011. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Beat (British band) per WP:ATD. He is mentioned in that article. I could only find sources with passing mentions in relation to his work with The International Beat. Nothing significant enough to pass WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 16:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero stand-alone notability or coverage, and the article proves such by coattailing off established musicians from more notable bands. Mentioned all but once in passing in The Beat article, which doesn't qualify him for a redirect. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  16:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - In response to the "redirect" voter above, it is inappropriate to redirect this musician to The Beat (British band) because he was not a member of that band and is only mentioned in the "post-breakup" section of their article due his much later association with some of the members. Otherwise this musician has some associations with various famous people but he does not inherit notability from them, and his own career has never received any reliable coverage. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 01:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Regrettable Delete per Nom: Not enough independent reliable sourcing for a stand alone article and entries in the "External links" are not considered reliable. Interviews at best would be primary and a redirect or merge is not possible per 's reasoning. One source is not sufficient for any article let alone a BLP and the digging required to get past the ambiguity with "Tony Beets" of the Gold Rush (TV series) (who doesn't have an article) shows the little notability of the subject. --  Otr500 (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.