Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Dupe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Tony Dupe

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable artist. Could find almost no third party non-trivial coverage about him or his work. Damiens .rf 17:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - At the time of nomination, the article has 2 sources that cover Tony Dupe. His work as a producer has attracted notice as shown by, , and .  And there is much more results from a Google News search I've not listed.  In assessing notability through sources, we need to take into account the amount and significance of the coverage.  Although Dupe is not the primary subject of much of the articles int he search result, they are not simply passing mentions; in particular, they single out his production work as a key element of a creative product. -- Whpq (talk) 15:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I've expanded the article and he now is cleary notable from coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The refs that have been added now prove the subject's notability. Jenks24 (talk) 06:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.