Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Horton (trainer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No policy-based reasons for keeping given, and article doesn't show any notability or coverage per WP:BIO Black Kite 18:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Tony Horton (trainer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Questionable notability. No “reliable sources”. High degree of spamminess. —the Ghost of Adrian Mineha! hold seance at 07:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep this is a reliable source. Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  23:16, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: That source is not used in the article, and discussion in “reliable sources” is necessary but not sufficient. Subject still of dubious notability; article still spammy and without “reliable sources”. —the Ghost of Adrian Mineha! hold seance at 23:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - interesting; find more reliable sources if necessary; if none available yet, add a "" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dandv (talk • contribs)
 * Please review WP:INTEREST. And the  tag is not for cases where a reliable source cannot be found; only for cases were one has not been found but plausibly exists. —the Ghost of Adrian Mineha! hold seance at 14:40, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Seems like a non-notable person, and I don't see how the article passes WP:BIO. He's known for an infomercial that's a red link? Really? That's not a claim to fame for Wikipedia's purposes. -Phoenixrod (talk) 03:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Although this article needs NPOV editing. I'd seen his name on the P90X infomercial, and wondered what his real credential were.  This article doesn't explain them, but it could be edited to do so.  Perhaps one day that P90X link will have an article attached to it as well.  Baiter (talk) 07:28, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I've tried quickly to find some sources that meet WP:RS and WP:V, and I'm having trouble coming up with anything but commercial sites and blogs. If the information on his "real credentials" isn't available in appropriate sources, that screams non-notable to me. I am happy to change my mind, however, if someone suggesting "keep" could supply such sources instead of simply speculating that they might exist in the future. -Phoenixrod (talk) 03:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.