Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Kelly (photographer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Tony Kelly (photographer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable photographer - fails WP:N - if non encyclopedic sentences and sources were removed pretty much a nothing article LegalSmeagolian (talk) 14:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists,  and Photography. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 14:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. While, as noted, the article was mostly egregious puffery by apparent COI/SPA accounts (of a type that was appalling to the point of being embarrassing for those involved), there does appear to be coverage of the subject in several news outlets. Some of which (found in my own WP:BEFORE) I've added to the article. As some of this "coverage" is interviews and Q&As and semi-connected outlets (like regional papers of the Independent News & Media stable - with which the subject apparently previously worked), I'm not inclined to strongly argue for a keep. But there is enough to sway me from a "delete" recommendation... Guliolopez (talk) 15:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep the coverage found by Guliolopez particularly some of the articles in the Irish Independent is enough to support an article in my opinion. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:43, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.