Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Marcu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Tony Marcu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article seems to be written in an advertisement fashion. Much of the information is unsourced and innapropriate. For example, it refers to thoughts he had in first grade. The section on roots contains innapropriate information about favorite colors. He doesn't seem to meet the requirements from WP:PORNBIO. The only notable thing is his suit against the government of Canada but Wikipedia does not keep records of everyone who has filed a suit. Ryan Vesey Review me!  07:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. The are no third party references to him anywhere, except a couple small media references to the lawsuit, but according to WP:1E, the event should more likely be covered than the person, and I think neither is significant.  It's not like he won the lawsuit.  Additionally the article does fail WP:PORNBIO (no awards for one thing).  Finally, regardless of notability, the article is a mess.  Nothing is properly sourced, yet claims are made about thought he had in grade one, and his favourite colour is listed. Millermk90 (talk) 08:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 03:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 04:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Well the sources are not exactly small media but I agree this is a WP:BLP1E. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.