Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Schibeci


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 21:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Tony Schibeci

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

fails WP:BIO, notable information can really be included in SEN 1116. Also seems a bit WP:FANCRUFT Michellecrisp (talk) 23:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * keep After some searching, I found several links to his interviews from different sources, added a couple of quick weaker refs, but found enough when looking to convince me that he would be considered notable in Australia. Not a super star, but notable enough and fairly well known in his field. D ENNIS B ROWN  (T) (C) 14:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment these references you've found seem more to prove he exists rather than meets WP:CREATIVE as a radio commentator. Michellecrisp (talk) 06:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete- this person probably warrants no more than a short mention at the SEN article. The references provided are very weak and don't come close to establishing notability in my opinion. Reyk  YO!  22:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete no notability and references in article are a joke not good.ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks notability, lacks 3rd party sources.--Rtphokie (talk) 14:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.