Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Schwartz (The Energy Project)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Flowerparty ☀ 00:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Tony Schwartz (The Energy Project)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:CSD in that it make a claim of significance, but it looks and feels like pure self-promotion. The only non-administrative edits so far have been by two users whose only edits are to this article. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jamie ☆ S93  00:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:48, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I looked at this article for speedy deletion a while back, but it seems to assert the man's notability at least as a semi-prominent author, and as far as my searches could tell, the claims in the article are true. While it is written in a promotional fashion, it is not overly so. Could use a WP:NPOV check and tighter referencing, but it appears to meet WP:N. - Running On Brains (talk page) 04:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete unless sources are put in to support claims to notability. لenna  vecia  15:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - There's actually quite a bunch of sources from Google News Archives Search. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with RunningOnBrains, notability still needs to be established with references. Click23 (talk) 16:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.