Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Van Bynen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn due to sourcing improvements. Bearcat (talk) 01:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Tony Van Bynen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced article about a mayor of a town in the 80K population range — which is large enough that he might qualify for a properly written and properly sourced article, certainly, but even the mayor of the largest city on the planet wouldn't be entitled to keep an unsourced stub with no real substance beyond saying he's the mayor. I'm willing to withdraw this if the article's content and sourcing can be substantively improved, but not for a three-line permastub. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 00:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - there may be some coverage as in  but does not meet the criteria at WP:POL - — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheQ Editor (talk • contribs) 21:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets minimum relevance criteria for being the mayor of a medium town for 8 years and councillor before that. Main problem with the original article was that it had not a single neutral source. I have added some sources, including a national newspaper interview. -- Taketa (talk) 06:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment All of them are invalid primary sources.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 10:02, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have added some more sources to the article. Feedback is appreciated. -- Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 10:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, Taketa. Consider this withdrawn. Bearcat (talk) 01:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.