Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Weisman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 02:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Tony Weisman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Speedy removed on the grounds that being ceo of a big company is a claim of notability. Maybe, but I see nothing here that justifies a standalone article: this isd simply a man doing his job. TheLongTone (talk) 14:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. sst✈discuss 15:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. sst✈discuss 15:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. sst✈discuss 15:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I'm going with weak keep. This is definitely not a speedy because there is a claim of notability where he received an award that was recognized by two independent sources. Not So Dumb Blond (talk) 15:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I will consider the CEO of a. company that operates in 26 countries through 40 offices across the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Asia and Oceania, employing 6,700 people notable. I found Chicago Tribune, Boston business update, NBC News, and New York Times. He was described as a Chicago ad agency veteran by Crain's Chicago Business. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 21:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of sourcing out there, I just ran his name in searches on wsj.com, nytimes.com. But, frankly, this article should not have been brought to AFD.  If you find a young actor or aspiring sportswriter sourced to press releases, then by all means bring him here. But this is the EEO of an enormous corporation.  OF COURSE there are sources.  In a case like this, just tag it for sourcing and move on.  Or, you know. source it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.