Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Wright (sleep deprivation) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  14:17, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Tony Wright (sleep deprivation)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Biography seems to be a case of WP:BLP1E. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I do think the arguments in the original AfD would have tended to a delete outcome, but the argument of WP:BLP1E certainly has stood the test of time. And it's time to go! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep For the same reason noted in the original 2014 AfD ie. available sources. There are new sources, continuous coverage addresses BLP1E, example:
 * A Google Books search of  has more I don't want to ref bomb this page or the article but there has been a steady drum beat  of coverage because there are only a handful of people claiming to have lasted this long without sleep and his claim is credible-enough for researchers it was "live streamed from a bar in Penzances" and Wright has gone on to do sleep research experiments at Manchester University and he's written a book about it, this was not a 1-time stunt. --  Green  C  15:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.