Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Zappone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 15:01, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Tony Zappone
Vanity, see WP:BIO -- M @  th  wiz  20  20  01:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Story seems to check out. He gets 15,000 google hits, many of which concern Kennedy. Bobby1011 01:30, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I'm fairly certain this was posted by someone close to Mr. Zappone, but I'm willing to wait and see if it can be turned into something useful. Slap a wikification tag on it and see what happens. Somebody can always nominate it again in a month. --djrobgordon 02:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-promotion is NOT what Wikipedia is about MiracleMat 04:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Makes a pretty good case for notability.  - ikkyu2  ( talk ) 07:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, looks notable. --Ter e nce Ong 13:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It seems a little vain, nothing really noteworthy here. Yanksox 13:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like a vanity page to me. ( A rundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 13:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable for 15,000 google hits. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I do not get 15,000 hits when I do a more specific search . Interesting, but based on what I see he does not pass WP:BIO. PJM 15:12, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Look for the bit about photographers in WP:BIO. Pretty sure this fits. - Jaysus Chris 20:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't think he fits that criterion. Has he written in periodicals with a circulation of 5,000 or more? On the other hand, he is locally famous, and is currently a somewhat well-known personality in the broadcast industry. I can't conclusively say that he is not notable.  Cdcon   22:36, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep: Junior famous. -- Jay  (Reply)  23:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep pro tem - borderline, but may turn out OK if developed. Staffelde 01:32, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and Wikify; meets standards of notability. --Cymsdale 13:26, 25 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.