Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Too Much of Heaven


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. L Faraone  01:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Too Much of Heaven

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm actually a big fan of most of Eiffel 65's music, and I've been willing to improve at least one Eiffel 65 article up to GA status. However, this is yet one of those articles that yet has great commercial performance, but unfortunatly can't be on Wikipedia. I was looking to see if there was enough background info and critical reviews to satisfy the notability of this article, but I was pretty much out of luck. I'm hoping someone can add more in-depth info and critically published opinions of this topic that's enough to be here and so I can withdraw this discussion. EditorE (talk) 02:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep this meets the WP:Music with appearances on several charts in different countries. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Charting is by and large considered the least reliable method of gauging notability for WP:NSONG. Editor  E  at ma talk page up, scotty! 13:40, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  03:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is clearly significant enough to be covered. At the very least it should be merged, although there's probably too much content to make that appropriate. --Michig (talk) 07:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage in reliable sources, as required by GNG. DoctorKubla (talk) 08:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep/Merge clearly passes NSONG and probably fails GNG but deletion is not even an option, maybe we could merge the content with the article about the album (I am definitely neutral about that), but this is just editorial matter and could be discussed in the proper places (ie talk pages). Cavarrone 09:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep significant chart hit in several countries, got as high as number 2 in Italy! Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.