Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Too Sane for This World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The series is not unsourcable and under WP:NTEMP it need not receive continued coverage.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Too Sane for This World

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NF: Lacks reliable sources. No reviews by nationally known critics. Etc. Brycehughes (talk) 08:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: From what I can see, only two of the movies appear to have been made. I'm trying to clean it as we speak, although I admit that I'm a little worried about a lack of notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm really frustrated by this as a whole. Rotten Tomatoes has two reviews listed for the first, which definitely helps push towards notability. I did find a mini review in the SF Gate by Laura Shumaker, who is considered to be a fairly RS on the subject of autism. I know we've used her as a source in various autism related articles before. I'm not familiar with people associated with autism, but I do know her name so that kind of says something for her. (Which brings it up to 3 reviews.) Now I also found a mention of the second film in a small community newspaper. I'm kind of leery about that one, but it was written by a staff member and it is a fairly lengthy mention. I'm going to hold off in the hopes that Schmidt or other editors can work their magic. It's kind of a neutral/weak keep somewhat on my end at the moment. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:22, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep-I think this seems good enough. Wgolf (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 07:52, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr  \ talk / 06:25, 18 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. A serious and sober effort has been made to find evidence of notability, and even given the ridiculously low bar to jump over, this topic really doesn't clear it properly. It made a splash, once (ok, not a splash, more a quiet plop), then vanished. Sorry, but well done for trying. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:40, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.