Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 10 Billboard Hot 100 singles of 2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-27 07:24Z 

Top 10 Billboard Hot 100 singles of 2006

 * — (View AfD)

There are pages like this for 2004 and 2005 as well... all poorly formatted, seems to fall under WP:NOT scenario. Not sure what the purpose is here, but this info can be found elsewhere. eo 15:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This doesn't seem notable on its own, only in its ability to give context to an article about an individual music single and its popularity amongst its contemporaries. Sancho McCann 22:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep These have a lot of info. These pages just need to be tagged for WikiProject Songs people to take a look at them.  I would tag them with songs and let the WP Songs folks handle the cleanup. TonyTheTiger 00:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NOT. TJ Spyke 03:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep These are notable by definition as the top songs of the year, and unlike lists of TV masts, they will remain the top songs of that year, so the list will become stable, although I do not see updates since November. This provides useful info.Edison 16:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. What you have said establishes notability of the individual songs on the list, not for Billboard's Top 100 lists. Provision of useful info is also not a sufficient condition for inclusion in Wikipedia. Sancho McCann 16:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Useful info here BillboardWikipedia 07:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment OK. But useful how?  The info is not organized very well and clicking any of the titles would bring up the chart information shown, within the songs' articles.  Seems like another random page to highlight current recording artists... my guess is that there was never any intention to create similar pages dating back to 1958. - eo 15:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.