Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 10 most viewed Taylor Swift's videos ( Vevo )


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Top 10 most viewed Taylor Swift's videos ( Vevo )

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an indiscriminate list of information; in fact, it could be WP:IINFO at its finest.. While a list like List of most viewed YouTube videos is probably notable, I don't think the topic of Taylor Swift YouTube videos, let alone which them is the most viewed, is a notable topic. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment Maybe the numbers could be added to the table at Taylor Swift discography, before the ref column as "views on Youtube". The bad thing is that with this kind of table you can't click on the views and have them be listed in order from highest to lowest. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 12:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per not being worth its own article and at best worth a table at some bigger Taylor Swift listings article. Like mentioned below, the (Vevo) addition makes this unviable for redirect. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 10:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy redirect to Taylor Swift discography at best. This isn't Billboard or WatchMojo.com edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 14:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Honestly, given the article title, I don't think it's a viable redirect given how it's unlikely anyone would place spaces before and after "Vevo". If this was something like "Most viewed Taylor Swift videos" then perhaps that would have been a viable redirect, but this appears to not be the case for this article. Also, adding viewcounts to the discography article section on music videos probably wouldn't make sense given how they would have to be updated regularly and in any case is probably indiscriminate information. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You'd be surprised how many editors there are who just love updating numbers like these. It's not even a baggage, it's like a joy. But the reason I'm not that keen to adding them is that the numbers are encyclopedic as a highest-to-lowest list but that table doesn't support this function and it would be a huge mess updating the table. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - it's not as if we balance it out with an article about Taylor Swift's least viewed videos Shritwod (talk) 19:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I am a fan of her but this page is irrelevant, anyone can just go to YouTube and search for it. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 10:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Just Shake It Off the encyclopedia already [rimshot]. It's unnecessary, and it should be the job of Youtube's most to least popular video feature.edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 21:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * NOTE This exact same list is or was also on the creator's user page. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 21:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete If anything merge into Taylor Swift. --Fixuture (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete – indiscriminate list, not useful as a redirect. sst ✈(conjugate) 03:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.