Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 10 nfl receivers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I'm kinda cold. Wizardman 05:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Top 10 nfl receivers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unencyclopedic list, arbitrary inclusion criteria. Based entirely on one site. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree.  Burner 0718  Jibba Jabba! 04:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete All this information is probably on the individual player's pages anyway. Who decided these are the top 10 receivers anyway?  C t j f 8 3 Talk 04:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia shouldn't contain original analysis like this. But note that the article doesn't currently seem to be linking to this AFD properly. --Rividian (talk) 04:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I click on the "this article's entry" link, and it links here for me  C t j f 8 3 Talk 04:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah it seems to work now. It was a redlink a minute ago. --Rividian (talk) 04:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Arbitrary inclusion criteria. Townlake (talk) 04:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails everything. It's indiscriminate, criteria for inclusion arbitrary, bleeds OR... Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 04:38, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.