Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 5 atp player this year


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   SPEEDY DELETED by User:Jimfbleak. J I P &#124; Talk 21:07, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Top 5 atp player this year

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Entire article is the Author's opinion. No sources. Since the topic is based on opinion, it is almost impossible to wikify. ~ Matthew  Say hi!How I've helped 04:54, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure OR, no possibility of sourcing.  Acroterion  (talk)  05:00, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - There should be a speedy delete category for "No credible intention to create an encyclopaedic article", but seeing as there isn't we'll have to settle for regular old Delete. Original research, non-encylopaedic topic, no evidence of notability. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as pure opinion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:21, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone please get some water to rinse off this soap. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, self-admitted original research, no sources whatsoever. Wikipedia is not a personal blog. J I P  &#124; Talk 06:45, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete original research, useless list. Wandering Courier (talk) 07:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - someone seems to have mistaken WP for a message board -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.