Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Cartman Episodes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:40, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Top Cartman Episodes
Spun off from main Eric Cartman page, but I see no encyclopedic value in including this list. Do we include every single "top X" list ever broadcast? Andrew Levine 02:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Listcruftic Delete Giant onehead 02:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP If we can have artist discographies, and lists of artists on record labels, then what does this hurt?--Stavdash 03:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This list was created for the simple fact that it was taking up too much space on the main Eric Cartman page.  This list also proves informative and is warrented, as the subject matter (Top Cartman episodes, as voted by viewers) was a factual event.--DtownG 03:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Being factual does not merit an article to be kept on Wikipedia. See WP:NOT--TBC TaLk?!? 03:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Very crufty, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.--TBC TaLk?!? 03:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is just an elaborate TV guide listing for one evening that's now over. Agent 86 03:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia is filled with list articles, much like this one.--The Real Avenger 03:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * All lists are not of equal use to an encyclopedia. Andrew Levine 03:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment If you cite some other articles "like this one", I'd be happy to consider nominating them for deletion. Agent 86 03:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. RobJ1981 04:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fancruft.--Hús ö nd 04:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep--Nwdavis 04:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per lisctcruft, we don't keep "Top episode/song/video" lists so I don't see why this is any different. It was just a online poll. TJ Spyke 05:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a tv guide or an indiscriminate collection of information. --IslaySolomon 05:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not that I necessarily feel that it's a useful article, but still I find something very smug about Wikipedians getting together and "voting" to have an article deleted.  If it is that trivial in your opinion, just don't read it.-- Incognito9810 06:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Then what, exactly, is the point of even having this page? Actually, if 'just don't read it' is a valid answer to questions of content merit on Wikipedia, what is the point of even having policies and guide lines in the first place? Why not just let absolutely anybody add absolutely anything? ~ Lav-chan 08:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: The closing admin is likely to ignore your keep "vote" unless you substantiate it with good reasoning. Zunaid 15:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete seems like a fairly pointless listing to me. Could easily be included in Eric Cartman in some form. MidgleyDJ 11:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as indiscriminate collection of information Zunaid 15:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research, followed by lack of notability. This is a ranked list and not verifiably sourced.  Were it not ranked, it would be completely non-notable as it's a list of South Park episodes featuring Cartman - and I'm fairly sure they all do. MLA 15:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all deletes already posted. hateless 16:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * DeleteNot important enough for its own article.Edison 17:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Arbusto 23:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Textbook fancruft, no usefulness at all. Allon FambrizziAllon Fambrizzi
 * Strong Delete per common sense Geedubber 04:51, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a pointless and subjective list.  Yamaguchi先生 23:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non encyclopedic content. --Dweller 12:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as ridiculously POV and pointless to boot. PS - I'm a South Park fan. Themindset 20:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.