Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Dogg (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I don't see anything in WP:G8 which would apply to Top Dogg discography. If you believe that should be deleted also, please open another AfD on it. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Top Dogg
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:MUSBIO. Fails WP:BIO; little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:ANYBIO; appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Magnolia677 (talk) 05:08, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Requesting canceling this AFD and re-listing with companion article Top Dogg discography, with options of "delete both," "keep Top Dogg and merge-and-redirect Top Dogg discography into it, and "keep both". Yes, I realize if you keep the existing AFD open and Top Dogg is deleted, the discography page will be speedy-deleted as a "page dependent on a non-existent page" but it's fairer to everyone to do it as a single nomination. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  05:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    08:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    08:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as there's simply no better improvement for an article. SwisterTwister   talk  07:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are literally thousands of hits with this moniker. But I went through the first several pages and other than an interview, there were a few trivial mentions, but most were about other people/groups with this same name, or using "top dogg".  Onel 5969  TT me 23:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * delete - fails notability standards. DangerDogWest (talk) 04:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.