Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Garden Ground Gear Force


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that this subject is sufficiently notable. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Top Garden Ground Gear Force

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable one off episode of a TV Series Jpeob 23:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - Top Gear of the Pops (last years equivelent) currently exists as an article. If there is a consensus for change here it might be worth looking at. Guest9999 (talk) 23:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - I only created this page because all the other one off 'non-notible' Top Gear spinoffs also have their own pages. If you give me a reason why this one should go, and the others don't then please inform me! LicenseFee (talk) 00:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - the article needs vastly improving, but all the other Top Gear specials have their own page. You can't delete one without deleting the others.  You either create one page to cover all of these one-off specials or agree that each has to have their own article.  Personally, I'm not bothered, but I'd hardly call these episodes "non notable" - they need to be covered somewhere. 88.104.204.138 (talk) 09:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment/Non Deletion I dont think this page should be deleted as all top gear spinoffs have a page so this one deserves it also. Sotonfc4life —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sotonfc4life (talk • contribs) 10:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

It shouldn't be deleted. Just expanded to meet the standards of a good article. Bearing in mind it was written the day after the event happened!  LB22   (talk to me!)  Email me! 13:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment/Non Deletion The article has been expanded now, and I think it's fine for an article. Anyone disagree? LicenseFee (talk) 23:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment It's been expanded with largely original research. I can't see many verifiable sources cited.Jpeob 04:27, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment/Non Deletion Though the article could use expansion and improvement, I think it is worth keeping. I read through WP:NOTE, and TGGGF seems, at face value, to meet notability requirements, especially if other non-episode specials have received their own pages and were found to be notable. This is equally notable. It needs more verifiable resources, yes, not deletion. diminutivething (talk) 21:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep- The article should be kept, it summarizes a Top Gear Special. The claim that the article should be deleted because it is original research has no grounds, it's a recent TV-show. Everything that is written about this Special is based and sourced on that TV-show. This TV-show because it's a Special and longer thann half an hour should be treated as any other movie. ⇨ EconomistBR ⇦   Talk  22:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. There are similar one-off articles for Comic Relief Does The Apprentice and Sport Relief Does The Apprentice. --Madchester (talk) 04:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - article seems pleanty notable enough to me. WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid argument, but having said that, there are a tonne of other perfectly notable articles on one-off shows, which shows that they can indeed be notable, as this is. Talk Islander 13:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability appears to be established. Dimitrii (talk) 22:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.