Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Hat (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Top Hat (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Brochure article.  scope_creep Talk  23:08, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:11, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:11, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:11, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:11, 19 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep? The article does cite some press release stuff but also several sources that do seem independent. Maybe some more critical coverage exists as well? I found this, which isn't much: Haukur (talk) 00:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep: The company has some sources that are likely to pass WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 04:39, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   05:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH & WP:PROMO. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:51, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:14, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete since subject fails WP:NCORP. The page was created by a contributor paid by the company but this fact should not affect the article's worthiness either way. An admission above by a Keep !voter that nothing much can be found in support of subject's notability is telling. -The Gnome (talk) 06:51, 9 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.