Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top TV (Indonesia)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to MNC Vision.  Sandstein  09:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Top TV (Indonesia)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has been 'notability' tagged since 2011. After looking, I could find no secondary coverage of this. Subject looks to fail WP:NPRODUCT and WP:GNG. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. -- PATH SLOPU (Talk) 13:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. -- PATH SLOPU (Talk) 13:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to MNC Vision Simply a pared-down and defunct 'skinny bundle' version of MNC Vision's main satellite service. It's a sentence there, at most.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 20:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Redirecting here is pointless since MNC Vision does not mention Top TV at all, and thus the redirect would fail WP:RDEL Criteria 10 because "the target article contains virtually no information on the subject". The subject fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Nothing to find in my search, and considering there are no references in the article, it also fails WP:V, since nothing there is verifiable. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I've added the mention.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:52, 6 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.