Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Ten SEC on CBS Games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 22:58, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Top Ten SEC on CBS Games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. No sources used describe the list in its entirety; they are merely refs about those specific games. This article as a list on the whole is non-notable, SEC-fancruft. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nom. References ABOUT the list are merely a list of the games. Remainder of references are about the games, which do not establish notability of the list. Could not find any other references that discuss the notability of the list. — X96lee15 (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional references and only purpose of the countdown was to fill 30 hours of airtime on CBSSN during the college football bowl season/Christmas to give the master control a break for bowl games they can't air.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 20:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Question was this a TV Series highlighting those games (which indicates that at least 1 person at CBS Sports thought they were the top 10), or are these just 10 games that a Wikipedia editor chose? It makes a difference at least to me.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * This was a TV series of the Top Ten SEC on CBS Games on a panel of CBS Experts Michiganwolverines2014 (talk) 22:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Then I'm Keep on this one. Clearly significant coverage was in place.  Maybe the article should just list the games and link to them in their own "game article" but now we're down to editing and not deletion.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, only significant coverage is from CBS themselves which isn't independent. Secret account 18:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and Secret. Patriarca12 (talk) 02:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.