Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Tier Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete: speedily deleted per A7 by User:Geni (A)[reply] .. (non-admin closure) ——  Serial  09:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Top Tier Group

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, lacks reliable sources Sanketio31 (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sanketio31 (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Can't see any indication of importance and this could probably be CSDed under WP:G11. User3749 (talk) 16:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep It is being covered in many reliable sources. It passes GNG. Clouthneah (talk) 16:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, 0 notability and once I removed the patently unreliable blackhat SEO sources, we're left with one, a press release and there's nothing better to be found. TAXIDICAE💰  16:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete I have tagged it under G11. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, speedy too if possible...the company offers a wide range of innovative solutions to meet the diverse needs of clients. Get out of here.  ——  Serial  21:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.