Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Young Indian CS 1.6 Players


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Top Young Indian CS 1.6 Players

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted because it fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY #7 which states, "Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories like these are not considered sufficient basis to create an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon. See also Wikipedia:Overcategorization for this issue in categories. " This applies because it is a article about a insignificant cross-category. It also fails WP:GNG as there are no "sources" for this article. This article is also WP:PROMOTION because User:Cs lover international contributed greatly to this article which suggests promotion. KAP03 (talk) 15:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Too specific of a subset and unsourced. Sergecross73   msg me  18:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and is obvious original research. --The1337gamer (talk) 11:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.